[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: `looking-back' strange warning
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: `looking-back' strange warning |
Date: |
Thu, 01 Oct 2015 20:15:23 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> Depending from the task it might be useful
You can pass (point-min) for the limit if that's what you want.
Making it optional Encourages people to think that looking-at is just
like looking-back, with the same performance characteristic, whereas
making it mandatory encourages people to put a reasonable limit and
hence avoid pathological behavior at the end of large buffers.
Stefan
- Re: `looking-back' strange warning, (continued)
- Re: `looking-back' strange warning, Stefan Monnier, 2015/10/08
- RE: `looking-back' strange warning, Drew Adams, 2015/10/08
- Re: `looking-back' strange warning, Stefan Monnier, 2015/10/08
- RE: `looking-back' strange warning, Drew Adams, 2015/10/08
- Re: `looking-back' strange warning, Stefan Monnier, 2015/10/08
RE: `looking-back' strange warning, Drew Adams, 2015/10/08
- Re: `looking-back' strange warning, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/08
- Re: `looking-back' strange warning, Andreas Röhler, 2015/10/08
- Re: `looking-back' strange warning, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/08
- Re: `looking-back' strange warning, Andreas Röhler, 2015/10/08
- Re: `looking-back' strange warning,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: `looking-back' strange warning, Michael Heerdegen, 2015/10/08
- Re: `looking-back' strange warning, Michael Heerdegen, 2015/10/08
- RE: `looking-back' strange warning, Drew Adams, 2015/10/08
- RE: `looking-back' strange warning, Drew Adams, 2015/10/08
- Re: `looking-back' strange warning, Tassilo Horn, 2015/10/08
- RE: `looking-back' strange warning, Drew Adams, 2015/10/08
- Re: `looking-back' strange warning, Tassilo Horn, 2015/10/08
- RE: `looking-back' strange warning, Drew Adams, 2015/10/08
- Re: `looking-back' strange warning, Andreas Röhler, 2015/10/08
- RE: `looking-back' strange warning, Drew Adams, 2015/10/08