[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is BSD licence compatible to export with emacs modules?
|
From: |
tomas |
|
Subject: |
Re: Is BSD licence compatible to export with emacs modules? |
|
Date: |
Fri, 28 Jul 2017 10:32:02 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 11:37:45PM +0200, Emanuel Berg wrote:
> > Yes. BSD is GPL compatible [1]. ( assume it's
> > the currently common "modified" or
> > "three-clause" license [2] and not the
> > original, four-clause license [4], which is
> > pretty uncommon these days. The four-clause
> > license has this non- advertising clause.
>
> What's the advantage "these days" using BSD
> instead of Debian (or derivative) like everyone
> else? Because I heard there is even
> a BSD Debian!
I think there's a misunderstanding. The OP was talking
about a piece of software under the BSD license, not about
BSD "the operating system". FWIW, Debian (or derivative)
include many important components which are BSD licensed.
As to your question... no systemd?
(runs for cover ;-P
best
- -- t
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAll69oIACgkQBcgs9XrR2kZfrgCbBW4kE6i5d+v2Nsf6focyiBqh
3RAAn1hHrcY3BnSdyxsbwtB9JBcn89ZN
=mWeO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----