[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Did `inline' used to do something else?
From: |
Emanuel Berg |
Subject: |
Re: Did `inline' used to do something else? |
Date: |
Mon, 20 Nov 2017 05:04:05 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) |
YT wrote:
> But specific as it might be, there is no
> distinction between `inline' and `progn'
> visible here.
OK, found it - commented lines below is the
yanked result of evaluation:
(symbol-plist 'inline)
;; (byte-compile byte-compile-progn
;; byte-optimizer
;; byte-optimize-inline-handler)
(symbol-plist 'progn)
;; (lisp-indent-function 0
;; byte-hunk-handler
;; byte-compile-file-form-progn
;; byte-compile byte-compile-progn
;; gv-expander [...] [butlast last gv-get
;; progn append] 10 " (fn DO &rest
;; EXPS)"])
> I think this is only confusing... an alias
> should be another way of referring to
> something as a convenience, nothing more.
Agree 100%
--
underground experts united
http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573
- Re: Did `inline' used to do something else?, (continued)
- Re: Did `inline' used to do something else?, Joost Kremers, 2017/11/19
- Re: Did `inline' used to do something else?, Joost Kremers, 2017/11/19
- Re: Did `inline' used to do something else?, Emanuel Berg, 2017/11/19
- Re: Did `inline' used to do something else?, Michael Heerdegen, 2017/11/19
- Re: Did `inline' used to do something else?, Emanuel Berg, 2017/11/19
- Re: Did `inline' used to do something else?, Eric Abrahamsen, 2017/11/19
- Re: Did `inline' used to do something else?, Emanuel Berg, 2017/11/19
- Re: Did `inline' used to do something else?, Eric Abrahamsen, 2017/11/19
- Re: Did `inline' used to do something else?, Emanuel Berg, 2017/11/19
- Re: Did `inline' used to do something else?, Emanuel Berg, 2017/11/19
- Re: Did `inline' used to do something else?,
Emanuel Berg <=
- Re: Did `inline' used to do something else?, Michael Heerdegen, 2017/11/20