[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer"
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer" |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Jul 2019 19:08:22 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> To make it even clearer, why don't you consider
> putting the command name in a column of its
> own?
I'm sure the maintainers would be happy to get a patch for that ;-)
Note that occasionally there can be a very long sequence of events
leading to a command, so you'd want to make sure that such an occurrence
doesn't force the first column to be insanely wide.
> Also, isn't, e.g. M-o more used than
> "ESC o", both in speech/writing _and_ in code -
`M-o` and `ESC o` aren't the same events, although usually they lead to
the same behavior. `view-lossage` is specifically useful in order to
see the "raw" events, for those cases where the difference between `ESC
o` and `M-o` might be important, so no I think that would be a bad idea.
Stefan
- improvements to the "lossage buffer", Emanuel Berg, 2019/07/30
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer",
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer", Emanuel Berg, 2019/07/30
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer", Emanuel Berg, 2019/07/30
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer", Marcin Borkowski, 2019/07/31
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer", Emanuel Berg, 2019/07/31
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer", Marcin Borkowski, 2019/07/31
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer", Emanuel Berg, 2019/07/31
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer", Marcin Borkowski, 2019/07/31
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer", Dan Sommers, 2019/07/31
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer", Marcin Borkowski, 2019/07/31
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer", Yuri Khan, 2019/07/31