Re: Another Emacs incompatibilty

[Emanuel Berg]

Stefan Monnier wrote:

> So the only really safe way to avoid introducing
> new problems is to leave the code 100% unchanged.

Fixing one bug can introduce another bug. But to be
fair, I think everyone understands that, and no one
suggests the code should never change one ... bit.

I'm an "under the hood maximalist" myself. As long as
I can configure the interface [see dump 1] to be
minimalist and clutter free I don't mind having all
kinds of huge software libraries below, invisible.
They might come handy one day and until then they
don't bother anyone.


[1] https://dataswamp.org/~incal/pimgs/comp/mail.png

-- 
underground experts united
http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573
https://dataswamp.org/~incal