[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: law question
From: |
Jean Louis |
Subject: |
Re: law question |
Date: |
Sat, 22 May 2021 00:30:39 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/2.0.6 (2021-03-06) |
* Emanuel Berg via Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor
<help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org> [2021-05-22 00:22]:
> Christopher Dimech wrote:
>
> > We would need more details, e.g. the original release
> > license. If it is to be free software the implementation
> > went be different if the two licences are incompatible.
>
> Should we assume the worst-case scenario?
Ah no, it is software, if it is in your hands, it is as
yours...
Licenses are only there to defend in courts, which should never
happen. But in Sweden, who knows...
Btw. I have always respected free software licenses but never
proprietary licenses. It is sad world without Warez.
--
Jean
Take action in Free Software Foundation campaigns:
https://www.fsf.org/campaigns
Sign an open letter in support of Richard M. Stallman
https://stallmansupport.org/
- law question, Emanuel Berg, 2021/05/21
- Re: law question, Jean Louis, 2021/05/21
- Re: law question, Christopher Dimech, 2021/05/21
- Re: law question, Emanuel Berg, 2021/05/21
- Re: law question, Christopher Dimech, 2021/05/21
- Re: law question, Emanuel Berg, 2021/05/21
- law question, Christopher Dimech, 2021/05/21
- law question, Christopher Dimech, 2021/05/21
- Re: law question, Emanuel Berg, 2021/05/21
- Re: law question, Christopher Dimech, 2021/05/21
- Re: law question, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/05/22