[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: law question
From: |
Emanuel Berg |
Subject: |
Re: law question |
Date: |
Sat, 22 May 2021 02:12:27 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Christopher Dimech wrote:
> The GPL was found to be an enforceable set of copyright
> terms (a license) in Jacobsen v. Katzer. What has changed
> now is that for the purposes of the court, the GPL is both
> a license, which can be enforced through a claim of
> copyright infringement, and a contract, which can be
> enforced through a claim of breach of contract (Artifex v.
> Hancom). You can allege both in your court claim in a single
> case, and fall back on one if you can’t prove the other.
> Thus, the potential to enforce the GPL in court is
> very strong.
Case closed! :)
--
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal
- law question, Emanuel Berg, 2021/05/21
- Re: law question, Jean Louis, 2021/05/21
- Re: law question, Christopher Dimech, 2021/05/21
- Re: law question, Emanuel Berg, 2021/05/21
- Re: law question, Christopher Dimech, 2021/05/21
- Re: law question, Emanuel Berg, 2021/05/21
- law question, Christopher Dimech, 2021/05/21
- law question, Christopher Dimech, 2021/05/21
- Re: law question,
Emanuel Berg <=
- Re: law question, Christopher Dimech, 2021/05/21
- Re: law question, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/05/22