[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SLIME and SBCL (Common Lisp)
From: |
Jean Louis |
Subject: |
Re: SLIME and SBCL (Common Lisp) |
Date: |
Mon, 28 Jun 2021 09:41:54 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/2.0.7+183 (3d24855) (2021-05-28) |
* Emanuel Berg <moasenwood@zoho.eu> [2021-06-27 02:06]:
> Trying to get SLIME and SBCL Common Lisp up-and-running but my
> old stuff won't wort. It gets stuck on the count-up
> connection phase.
Before few years, SLIME worked just fine. I don't know now, somehow it
breaks connection too often. So I find it easier to disable it and use
M-x run-lisp -- it seem to be so much more stable work. Connection is
not easily broken unless I do kill-emacs by mistake. I don't have
access to all features of SLIME, but hey.
There is certain benefit of programming without helper functions as it
drives memory and thinking better. And I use CLISP implementation that
has a readline, so I run separate vterm or terminal where I can
quickly write any command and get its apropos or quickly jump to the
documentation of a function. SLIME has those features and when I am
not using SLIME I switch to CLISP and readline TAB TAB, documentation
opens for every function.
SBCL does not have a readline.
I also try to minimize libraries and just implement practical
functionality without dependent software.
Yesterday I was supposed to write a general Double Opt-In program in
Common Lisp but I wrote it in Emacs Lisp. I guess I will have to
rewrite it in Common Lisp, then I will do the same in Chicken,
Dr. Racket, Scheme and Perl, then maybe other languages to add.
--
Jean
Take action in Free Software Foundation campaigns:
https://www.fsf.org/campaigns
In support of Richard M. Stallman
https://stallmansupport.org/