[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [External] : Re: Testing whether a list contains at least one non-ni
From: |
tomas |
Subject: |
Re: [External] : Re: Testing whether a list contains at least one non-nil element |
Date: |
Sat, 29 Oct 2022 08:38:00 +0200 |
On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 09:09:12AM -0400, Stefan Monnier via Users list for the
GNU Emacs text editor wrote:
> Michael Heerdegen [2022-10-28 08:20:45] wrote:
> > <tomas@tuxteam.de> writes:
> >> If you are doing it "by hand", why not indulge in Lisp's
> >> "classic elegance", like so:
[...]
> > You don't want to implement such functions in Emacs with recursion
> > because you'll easily hit `max-lisp-eval-depth' when they are called.
>
> Indeed (and it's significantly slower than the corresponding loop
> without function calls).
I /knew/ I was missing something. The back of my brain mumbled
"does Emacs have tail recursion elimination or doesn't it?"
> > Sorry to tell you, but a loop is the preferable way in Elisp.
>
> Luckily, since Emacs-28 you can have your cake and eat it too:
>
> (defun has-non-nil (lst)
> (named-let loop ((lst lst))
> (cond
> ((null lst) nil)
> ((consp lst) (or (not (null (car lst))) (loop (cdr lst))))
> (t (error "Not a proper list! You cheater!")))))
Thanks for that :)
> Admittedly, here the `named-let` construct gives you only the
> elimination of tail-recursion, but in many other circumstances it
> also leads to quite elegant code.
Now I think of it, I saw something flashing past emacs-devel; back
then I must have thought "oh, nice, I've got to play with this..."
Now it sank in. So thanks :)
Cheers
--
t
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: [External] : Re: Testing whether a list contains at least one non-nil element, (continued)
- Re: [External] : Re: Testing whether a list contains at least one non-nil element, Emanuel Berg, 2022/10/27
- RE: [External] : Re: Testing whether a list contains at least one non-nil element, Drew Adams, 2022/10/27
- Re: [External] : Re: Testing whether a list contains at least one non-nil element, Jean Louis, 2022/10/27
- Re: [External] : Re: Testing whether a list contains at least one non-nil element, tomas, 2022/10/28
- Re: [External] : Re: Testing whether a list contains at least one non-nil element, Jean Louis, 2022/10/28
- Re: [External] : Re: Testing whether a list contains at least one non-nil element, Michael Heerdegen, 2022/10/28
- Re: [External] : Re: Testing whether a list contains at least one non-nil element, Stefan Monnier, 2022/10/28
- Re: [External] : Re: Testing whether a list contains at least one non-nil element, Michael Heerdegen, 2022/10/29
- Re: [External] : Re: Testing whether a list contains at least one non-nil element, Stefan Monnier, 2022/10/29
- Re: [External] : Re: Testing whether a list contains at least one non-nil element, Emanuel Berg, 2022/10/30
- Re: [External] : Re: Testing whether a list contains at least one non-nil element,
tomas <=
- Re: [External] : Re: Testing whether a list contains at least one non-nil element, Emanuel Berg, 2022/10/30
- Re: [External] : Re: Testing whether a list contains at least one non-nil element, Emanuel Berg, 2022/10/29
- Re: [External] : Re: Testing whether a list contains at least one non-nil element, Emanuel Berg, 2022/10/29
- Re: [External] : Re: Testing whether a list contains at least one non-nil element, Emanuel Berg, 2022/10/28
- Elisp and CL (was: Re: [External] : Re: Testing whether a list contains at least one non-nil element), Emanuel Berg, 2022/10/28
- Re: Testing whether a list contains at least one non-nil element, Emanuel Berg, 2022/10/27
Re: Testing whether a list contains at least one non-nil element, Michael Heerdegen, 2022/10/25