Re: [External] : Re: Emacs 30.0 warning from `cl-pushnew' and `memql'

[Emanuel Berg]

Stefan Monnier via Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor wrote:

>> If a better default predicate exists for Elisp then Elisp
>> should add its own `pushnew', using that better predicate
>> as default. It shouldn't substitute that predicate as the
>> default of `cl-pushnew'.
>
> Won't happen:
> - it would break compatibility with packages still using
>   cl.el's `pushnew`.
> - when ELisp uses the same name as Common Lisp, there's
>   a lot of human pressure to preserve as much as possible of
>   the semantics.
>
> So, if we want something with a different default, we'll
> probably want to give it another name.

`1+'

-- 
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal