Re: Lookarounds and recursion in Emacs regexes

[Emanuel Berg]

Eli Zaretskii wrote:

>>>> It doesn't prevent adding other extension languages, nor
>>>> even does it necessarily prevent changing the
>>>> implementation language to another one in theory.
>>>
>>> Indeed, but replacing ELisp would probably need to rewrite
>>> a lot of internals currently implemented in C, since most,
>>> if not all, of them are currently very tightly coupled
>>> with Lisp and assume the existence and
>>> design/implementation of various aspects of the
>>> Lisp machine.
>> 
>> I don't think anyone suggests replacing Elisp
>
> Stefan did, in the part cited above. he didn't suggest it,
> but he said it's not prevented. And I replied to that part.

It depends, I suppose as long as that's only part of
the reply?

-- 
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal