Re: use-package :after ??

[Emanuel Berg]

Eli Zaretskii wrote:

> Thanks, but the discussion here is centered on the
> documentation of use-package and whether it needs some
> improvements and clarifications. There should be no need to
> examine the macro-expansion of use-package's macros to
> reason about the documentation clarity.

It should be automated based on the packages own properties,
with no extra source needed, then the documentation will be
even more clear - and it will work much better, as well.

-- 
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal