[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: use-package :after ??
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: use-package :after ?? |
Date: |
Tue, 16 May 2023 19:16:03 +0300 |
> From: David Masterson <dsmasterson@gmail.com>
> Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
> Date: Mon, 15 May 2023 15:19:59 -0700
>
> >> (use-package a :defer t :after b)
> >> (use-package b :demand t :after c)
> >> (use-package c :defer t)
> >>
> >> Does b force the loading of a and/or c because of :after and the mixed
> >> :demand/:defer? Or is b forced to defer?
> >
> > a will be loaded immediately after b is loaded.
> > b will be loaded immediately after c is loaded.
>
> Are you implying that b is (effectively?) deferred until after c? Or,
> another way of saying it is that demand/defer has no meaning when after
> is applied to the package (c controls demand/defer).
Yes, that is my reading of the docs.
> The statement ":defer/:demand has no meaning when :after is used -- the
> package will be loaded immediately after the listed packages" makes
> sense to me.
>
> I haven't used them yet, but should something like this also be said for
> :if and :requires?
Isn't that clear from their description?
- Re: use-package :after ??, (continued)
- Re: use-package :after ??, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/05/12
- Re: use-package :after ??, David Masterson, 2023/05/12
- Re: use-package :after ??, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/05/12
- Re: use-package :after ??, David Masterson, 2023/05/15
- Re: use-package :after ??, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/05/15
- Re: use-package :after ??, David Masterson, 2023/05/15
- Re: use-package :after ??,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Message not available
- Re: use-package :after ??, David Masterson, 2023/05/15
- Re: use-package :after ??, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/05/15
- Re: use-package :after ??, David Masterson, 2023/05/15
- Re: use-package :after ??, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/05/16
- Re: use-package :after ??, David Masterson, 2023/05/16
- Re: use-package :after ??, David Masterson, 2023/05/16
- Re: use-package :after ??, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/05/17
- Re: use-package :after ??, David Masterson, 2023/05/17
- Re: use-package :after ??, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/05/18
- Re: use-package :after ??, Lynn Winebarger, 2023/05/18