[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: is melpa just unsigned?
From: |
Michael Heerdegen |
Subject: |
Re: is melpa just unsigned? |
Date: |
Mon, 22 May 2023 01:36:42 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Emanuel Berg <incal@dataswamp.org> writes:
> > If you get no answers here... since Melpa is not part of
> > Emacs, maybe you have more luck if you ask the Melpa people?
>
> You mean they don't read here? :(
I don't know. Some days ago I opened an Github issue with an request
for an answer and improvement of the documentation of Melpa so that
users can read about this. So far nobody responded. Maybe they are all
on vacation or nobody wants to say something wrong, I don't know.
Michael.
- is melpa just unsigned?, Samuel Wales, 2023/05/18
- Re: is melpa just unsigned?, Michael Heerdegen, 2023/05/18
- Re: is melpa just unsigned?, Emanuel Berg, 2023/05/21
- Re: is melpa just unsigned?,
Michael Heerdegen <=
- Re: is melpa just unsigned?, Samuel Wales, 2023/05/22
- Re: is melpa just unsigned?, Platon Pronko, 2023/05/22
- RE: [External] : Re: is melpa just unsigned?, Drew Adams, 2023/05/22
- Re: is melpa just unsigned?, Daniel Fleischer, 2023/05/23
- Re: is melpa just unsigned?, Samuel Wales, 2023/05/26
- Re: is melpa just unsigned?, Björn Bidar, 2023/05/29