help-gnunet
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Solved :RE: failed verification & connectivity ? was Re: [Help-gnunet] g


From: tapiov
Subject: Solved :RE: failed verification & connectivity ? was Re: [Help-gnunet] gnunetd segmentation fault 0.5.5 + backtrace
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 22:17:50 +0300
User-agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.1

Ok, that was me. Apologies. 

> 
> I am still seeing some of the CRC failed and session key failed msgs
> but they are less common now. My gnunet-stats | grep connected
> returns a constant 0 BUT still I am d/lng a file at the same time???
> 
> ~/bin > ./gnunet-stats | grep connected
> # currently connected nodes                                 :               
> 0
> 
> WTF? :)
> 
> BR,
> 
> Tapio
> 
> > > I am getting following warnings, are these normal :
> > >
> > > Aug 24 18:13:08 WARNING: verifySKS: host
> > > 2F7A9C9A4D62E128EDD5D444346F129F9916CAC8 for sessionkey exchange not
> > known
> > > Aug 24 18:13:08 WARNING: session key from
> > > 2F7A9C9A4D62E128EDD5D444346F129F9916CAC8 failed verification, ignored!
> > > Aug 24 18:13:29 WARNING: verifySKS: host
> > > 0949054F82BC25E2D9F696C771F3360D6588C2B1 for sessionkey exchange not
> > known
> > > Aug 24 18:13:29 WARNING: session key from
> > > 0949054F82BC25E2D9F696C771F3360D6588C2B1 failed verification, ignored!
> > > Aug 24 18:13:42 WARNING: CRC failed from
> > > A1FB8A180FBBC6C9BE11415DC7D3B1FDC0F9CE54, msg ignored (wrong skey?)
> > > Aug 24 18:13:42 WARNING: CRC failed from
> > > 4A0B917BB74182ABE30A591E791C8A0FAEAD27C8, msg ignored (wrong skey?)
> > 
> > The "wrong skey" can happen in normal operation but should be rare. The
> "host
> > 
> > XXX for sessionkey exchange not known" is also generally harmless but
> should
> > 
> > not happen. The "failed verification" should NOT happen in practice and is
> an
> > 
> > indicator that the RSA-signing of either your peer or the other peer has
> some
> > 
> > problem. If your peer actually connects to other peers, it is probably not
> 
> > you (see output ofgnunet-stats | grep connected).
> > 
> > To summarize, the warnings are definitely harmless if you can connect to
> > other 
> > peers (according to gnunet-stats).
> > 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Help-gnunet mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnunet
> 






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]