help-gnunet
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Help-gnunet] Segfault on 'gnunet-transport-check -p' with 0.7.0e


From: Christian Grothoff
Subject: Re: [Help-gnunet] Segfault on 'gnunet-transport-check -p' with 0.7.0e
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 13:23:45 -0700
User-agent: KMail/1.9.3

On Sunday 20 August 2006 00:38, Jérôme Blanc wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am using an up to date Mandriva 2006 x86_64. I compiled from the source
> the latest libextractor (0.5.14) and GNUnet (0.7.0e) versions.
>
> I did the basic configuration with gnunet-setup, and then generated all the
> necessary config files with gnunet-update.
>
> Following the documentation, I then tested the transports and I obtained
> the following :
>
> address@hidden ~]$ gnunet-transport-check
> Testing transport(s) udp tcp http nat
> `tcp' transport OK.  It took 92ms to transmit 1 messages of 11 bytes each.
> `http': Could not send.
> `udp' transport OK.  It took 2ms to transmit 1 messages of 11 bytes each.
> aoû 20 09:33:57 ERROR: `pthread_kill' failed with error code ESRCH: Aucun
> processus de ce type
>
> I've got there a first error which doesn't seem to have any effect. Still I
> guess it's not really normal ;-)

Right, IIRC this one has been fixed in SVN already.

> But then I tried with the -p options and here is a deeper trouble :
>
> address@hidden ~]$ gnunet-transport-check -p
> Available transport(s): udp tcp http nat
> Erreur de segmentation
>
> ('Erreur de segmentation' stands for 'Segmentation Fault').
>
> Is there anything I can do to find out the reason of the Segfault or that I
> might help debug it for the next version ?

Sure, read the GNUnet FAQ on reporting segmentation faults.  If you follow 
those instructions, you should get the information we need in order to fix 
the problem.

Best,

Christian




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]