help-grub
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Unable to boot UEFI from 2.04


From: David Huffman
Subject: Re: Unable to boot UEFI from 2.04
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2020 09:13:20 -0800

I’ve changed the partition ID, but made no difference. I found that a different 
kernel level was able to execute.

I am able to execute kernel 4.19.0-12-amd64 (debian 10.5), but am unable to 
execute kernel 2.6.32-358.el6.x86_64 (RHEL 6.0). Is there a minimum Linux 
kernel level supported with grub 2.04? 

Thanks,
David

> On Dec 2, 2020, at 2:38 PM, Hanson Char <hanson.char@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Seems you are missing an EFI System partition which is necessary for UEFI 
> boot (EF00).
> 
> FWIW, I’ve had success creating an EFI system partition using gdisk, 
> building+installing grub 2.04 from source, and UEFI boot on both Debian and 
> Centos.
> 
> Regards,
> Hanson
> 
>> On Dec 2, 2020, at 12:55 PM, David Huffman <dhuffmansd@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> I have built 2.04 from source (no errors). I have a script to create a 
>> BIOS/UEFI bootable hard drive. The grub-install command I am running 
>> succeeds without errors, but the kernel does not seem to execute when 
>> booting from UEFI (BIOS is fine).
>> 
>> Adding debug=all to the configuration file shows the execution stops at:
>> (...last three lines)
>> 
>> diskefiefidisk.c:595: reading 0x40 sectors at sector 0x48dc0 from hd1
>> diskefiefidisk.c:595: reading 0x40 sectors at sector 0x48e00 from hd1
>> diskefiefidisk.c:595: reading 0x40 sectors at sector 0x48e40 from hd1
>> 
>> If I use the grub /usr/lib/grub/x86_64-efi files (*.mod, kernel.img, etc) 
>> poached from Debian 10.5, the system executes the kernel properly. If I just 
>> swap out the x86_64-efi directory with the files I compiled, the kernel does 
>> not execute. I am using the grub-install program I compiled from source in 
>> both cases.The only difference are the files in lib/grub/x86_64-efi/.
>> 
>> I have found references that linuxefi.mod was removed from grub and is a 
>> “distro patch”. This module appears to be missing from by source build but 
>> removing it from the debian grub files didn’t seem to make a difference.
>> 
>> Here are the commands used to build:
>> 
>> configure --with-platform=efi --target=x86_64 --disable-device-mapper 
>> —prefix=$GRUBDIR
>> make
>> make install
>> 
>> Inside $GRUBDIR I have all of the files I would expect from the build.
>> 
>> The disk has three partitions with an msdos partition table:
>> 
>> # sfdisk -l /dev/sdb
>> 
>> Disk /dev/sdb: 1305 cylinders, 255 heads, 63 sectors/track
>> Units = cylinders of 8225280 bytes, blocks of 1024 bytes, counting from 0
>> 
>>  Device Boot Start     End   #cyls    #blocks   Id  System
>> /dev/sdb1   *      0+     12-     13-    102400   83  Linux  
>> /dev/sdb2         12+     25-     13-    102400   83  Linux
>> /dev/sdb3         25+   1305-   1280-  10279936   83  Linux
>> /dev/sdb4          0       -       0          0    0  Empty
>> 
>> /dev/sdb2 on /mnt type ext2 (rw)
>> /dev/sdb1 on /mnt/boot/EFI type vfat (rw)
>> 
>> Here is the grub-install commands used:
>> 
>> FOR BIOS:
>> grub-install —force --boot-directory=$TMPMNT/boot --target=i386-pc 
>> —directory=$GRUBDIR/i386-pc  /dev/sdb
>> 
>> FOR UEFI       
>> grub-install --removable --efi-directory=$TMPMNT/boot/EFI 
>> --boot-directory=$TMPMNT/boot --target=x86_64-efi 
>> --directory=$GRUBDIR/x86_64-efi /dev/sdb
>> 
>> At this point I am not sure what else to look at to find out what is 
>> different between the modules and kernel.img file I compile and what is 
>> supplied with debian. Any assistance in tracking down the problem would be 
>> appreciated.
>> 
>> 
>> - David
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]