[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 4th set of permission bits?
From: |
Ivan Jager |
Subject: |
Re: 4th set of permission bits? |
Date: |
Fri, 01 Dec 2000 16:47:11 -0300 |
To be honest, I just heard about that patch a few days ago. I havn't
even tried it yet. I hope is isn't to specific to Linux.
Robert Marlow wrote:
> Actually I discussed this whole permissions thing with Jim Meyering and
> that's what he suggested. I haven't looked further into it yet though. Do
> you know much about ACL? It's a completely new concept to me (actually,
> this whole thing's new but I gotta start somewhere, right? ;> )
>
> On Fri, 1 Dec 2000, Ivan Jager wrote:
>
> > IMHO, the best solution would be to drop the last set of permissions and
> > port the ACL patch for Linux from http://acl.bestbits.at/ :) How hard
> > would that be?
> >
--
Ivan Jager
- Re: 4th set of permission bits?, Robert Marlow, 2000/12/01
- Re: 4th set of permission bits?, Marcus Brinkmann, 2000/12/01
- Re: 4th set of permission bits?, Ivan Jager, 2000/12/01
- Re: 4th set of permission bits?, Marcus Brinkmann, 2000/12/01
- Re: 4th set of permission bits?, Ivan Jager, 2000/12/01
- Re: 4th set of permission bits?, Neal H Walfield, 2000/12/01
- Re: 4th set of permission bits?, Ivan Jager, 2000/12/01
- Re: 4th set of permission bits?, Marcus Brinkmann, 2000/12/02
- Re: 4th set of permission bits?, Ivan Jager, 2000/12/02
- Re: 4th set of permission bits?, Marcus Brinkmann, 2000/12/02
- Re: 4th set of permission bits?, Niels Möller, 2000/12/13
Re: 4th set of permission bits?, Robert Marlow, 2000/12/02