[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 4th set of permission bits?
From: |
Neal H Walfield |
Subject: |
Re: 4th set of permission bits? |
Date: |
Fri, 1 Dec 2000 16:20:46 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
> > > IMHO, the best solution would be to drop the last set of permissions and
> > > port the ACL patch for Linux from http://acl.bestbits.at/ :) How hard
> > > would that be?
The issue here is that you have admitted to knowing nothing about either of
them: who are you then to say what is better or even, ``the best.''
> I asked how hard it would be because I don't know if it is just copying
> and changing some names of variables, or if it practicaly needs to be
> rewriten.
It would have to be rewritten.
-Neal
--
Neal H Walfield
University of Massachusetts at Lowell
neal@walfield.org or neal@cs.uml.edu
- Re: 4th set of permission bits?, Robert Marlow, 2000/12/01
- Re: 4th set of permission bits?, Marcus Brinkmann, 2000/12/01
- Re: 4th set of permission bits?, Marcus Brinkmann, 2000/12/02
- Re: 4th set of permission bits?, Ivan Jager, 2000/12/02
- Re: 4th set of permission bits?, Marcus Brinkmann, 2000/12/02
- Re: 4th set of permission bits?, Niels Möller, 2000/12/13
Re: 4th set of permission bits?, Robert Marlow, 2000/12/02