Re: Improving Hurd

[Jeroen Dekkers]

Maybe I should try to look if I didn't have any unfinished sentences
before pressing the send button.

On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 10:35:21PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 06:46:17PM +0200, Jan Atle Ramsli wrote:
> > Ognyan Kulev wrote:
> > > I wonder why so many people talk that Hurd will not be able to do
> > > anything sensible soon instead of improving it.
> > 
> > I think you may find that this will improve with the change from Mach to
> > L4.
> 
> What will improve? I don't think that the change to L4 will improve
> anything, at least not in the beginning. Don't expect that the Hurd
> just turns in something magically superior when it runs on 
... L4.
 
> > But imagine if the first year had been used to analyze and specify it.
> 
> The first year of what? And to analyze and specify what? If you want
> to give critic, give good constructive critic instead of some 
... not very clear utterances.

Jeroen Dekkers
-- 
Jabber supporter - http://www.jabber.org Jabber ID: jdekkers@jabber.org
Debian GNU supporter - http://www.debian.org http://www.gnu.org
IRC: jeroen@openprojects

pgpBwAHlBtRqR.pgp
Description: PGP signature