[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Improving Hurd
From: |
Jan Atle Ramsli |
Subject: |
Re: Improving Hurd |
Date: |
Sun, 21 Apr 2002 16:03:21 +0200 |
Jeff Bailey wrote:
>
> It's amazing that with such a patronizing tone that you would expect a
> positive response.
>
This looks like the response I got the last time.
I am not the 'patron' here, _you_ are!
I try to _understand_, I try to find some common ground, what are the
guidelines, how am I to proceeed?
If the idea of 'strategy' and 'interrupt' sections have been abandoned,
I want to know: Why?
What was wrong with them?
I try to say: This is how _I_ do it, this is what _I_ know, is there any
way that this can fit in?
What theoretical background do I need ... etc. .. etc...
> Otherwise it looks alot like you're throwing terms around just to
> sound good.
.. with the purpose of _____?
- Re: Design Decisions and Hurd/L4 work (was: Re: Improving Hurd), (continued)
- Re: Design Decisions and Hurd/L4 work (was: Re: Improving Hurd), Patrick Strasser, 2002/04/22
- Re: Design Decisions and Hurd/L4 work (was: Re: Improving Hurd), Bill White, 2002/04/22
- Re: Improving Hurd, Jeroen Dekkers, 2002/04/20
- Re: Improving Hurd, Jeroen Dekkers, 2002/04/20
- Re: Improving Hurd, Jeroen Dekkers, 2002/04/20
- Re: Improving Hurd, Jan Atle Ramsli, 2002/04/21
- Re: Improving Hurd, Jeff Bailey, 2002/04/21
- Re: Improving Hurd,
Jan Atle Ramsli <=
- Re: Improving Hurd, Ryan M. Golbeck, 2002/04/21
- Re: Improving Hurd, Jan Atle Ramsli, 2002/04/21
- Re: Improving Hurd, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/04/21
- Re: Improving Hurd, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/04/21
- Re: Improving Hurd, Jan Atle Ramsli, 2002/04/21
- Re: Improving Hurd, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/04/22
- Meta-info: Comments?, Jan Atle Ramsli, 2002/04/22
- Re: Meta-info: Comments?, Grant Bowman, 2002/04/22
- Re: Meta-info: Comments?, Jan Atle Ramsli, 2002/04/22
- Re: Meta-info: Comments?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/04/22