[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: What would it take....
From: |
Da Zheng |
Subject: |
Re: What would it take.... |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Dec 2009 15:49:01 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812) |
Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Da Zheng, le Wed 23 Dec 2009 10:21:50 +0800, a écrit :
>>> Anyway, deciding between shared memory or pure IPC is not really an
>>> issue. I believe the more difficult part is how to make process
>>> actually perform IPCs securely. It can probably be useful to check how
>>> shm was implemented.
>> Do you mean shm device in Linux or in Xen?
>
> In Hurd, the patch from Marcus Brinkmann.
> (debian/patches/hurd-i386/submitted-sysvshm.diff in the debian glibc
> sources)
>
OK, thank you.
One more thing: is it enough to only use something like spin_lock (or volatile
variable + memory barrier) to protect a variable in shared memory between two
processes?
Zheng Da
- Re: What would it take...., (continued)
- Re: What would it take...., Da Zheng, 2009/12/22
- Re: What would it take...., Samuel Thibault, 2009/12/22
- Re: What would it take...., Da Zheng, 2009/12/22
- Re: What would it take...., Samuel Thibault, 2009/12/23
- Re: What would it take....,
Da Zheng <=
- Re: What would it take...., Samuel Thibault, 2009/12/23
- Re: What would it take...., Da Zheng, 2009/12/23
- Re: What would it take...., Samuel Thibault, 2009/12/23
- Re: What would it take...., Samuel Thibault, 2009/12/23
- Re: What would it take...., Da Zheng, 2009/12/23
- Re: What would it take...., Da Zheng, 2009/12/23
- Re: What would it take...., Samuel Thibault, 2009/12/23
- Re: What would it take...., Da Zheng, 2009/12/23
Re: What would it take...., olafBuddenhagen, 2009/12/23