[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: forcing a rule
From: |
Noel Yap |
Subject: |
Re: forcing a rule |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Apr 2004 12:46:07 -0400 |
Boris Kolpackov wrote:
> I agree with all that you've said. But I still think it's a bad
> practice to silently ignore patches and effort people put in
> creating them. I for example went an extra mile and added
> documentation for $(lastword) so that it would be complete.
I can't speak for the GNU make project (and I don't have time to read up on the
topic), but another open source project I've worked on _requires_ documentation
of a patch just to be considered for inclusion.
Noel
- Re: MAKEFLAGS (Was: forcing a rule), (continued)
- Re: MAKEFLAGS (Was: forcing a rule), Noel Yap, 2004/04/02
- Re: MAKEFLAGS (Was: forcing a rule), Noel Yap, 2004/04/02
- Re: MAKEFLAGS (Was: forcing a rule), Boris Kolpackov, 2004/04/04
- Re: MAKEFLAGS (Was: forcing a rule), Noel Yap, 2004/04/14
- Re: MAKEFLAGS (Was: forcing a rule), Boris Kolpackov, 2004/04/14
- Re: MAKEFLAGS (Was: forcing a rule), Noel Yap, 2004/04/14
- Re: forcing a rule, Paul D. Smith, 2004/04/04
- Re: forcing a rule, Boris Kolpackov, 2004/04/04
- Re: forcing a rule, Paul D. Smith, 2004/04/04
- Re: forcing a rule, Boris Kolpackov, 2004/04/04
- Re: forcing a rule,
Noel Yap <=
- Re: forcing a rule, Boris Kolpackov, 2004/04/14