Re: Parallel build dependency locking

[Boris Kolpackov]

Christopher Sean Morrison <address@hidden> writes:

> Sounds like
> it's fairly safe to presume that there's no concurrent make file/job
> locking across to submakes (e.g. some file-based semaphore locking,
> shared memory locking, etc).  Is this a bug/feature request worth
> reporting?

No. ;-)

Seriously, if you are building the same target more than once then
it's a bug in your makefile and you normally wouldn't want make to
hide it from you.

-boris