[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: setting a make "include" path right from the get-go
From: |
Robert P. J. Day |
Subject: |
Re: setting a make "include" path right from the get-go |
Date: |
Tue, 9 Dec 2008 07:55:11 -0500 (EST) |
User-agent: |
Alpine 2.00 (LFD 1167 2008-08-23) |
On Tue, 9 Dec 2008, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> >
> > i want to clean all that up and have make use an include-dir path
> > and be able to change all of the above to, of course, the simpler:
> >
> > include someutil.mak
>
> Why not just use:
>
> include $(call magic,someutil.mak)
>
> Where magic is a macro that based on a variabes passed
> or something decide on the directory to try.
>
> Something like this mockup for example:
> magic = $(if $(wildcard $(mydir)/$1),$(mydir)/$1, \
> $(if $(wildcard $(anotherdir)/$1),$(anotherdir)/$1,NOTFOUND))
>
> mydir could be set recursively or could be the dir of Makefile or
> could be absolute.
> In other words the possibilities are many to fidn the dir.
perhaps i'm just being thick, but i don't see how this solves the
problem. sure, that "magic" macro would work fine. but where would a
makefile get its definition? it could get it via including a handy
makefile of macros. and where would it find that handy makefile of
macros to include? oh ...
i would still like the ability to define something like
--include-dir at the top level, and have that option propagate
throughout my build to be used by all subsequent sub-makes. can't
that be done?
rday
p.s. as a top-level solution, i can set up the alias
alias mymake="make -I..."
and tell everyone to use "mymake" from now on, so that's how i could
get my includes into that top-level makefile. but it's the subsequent
propagation through all submakes that is still an issue.
perhaps i should just set an environment variable and have everyone
do:
include ${MKFILESDIR}/handy.mak
but i still consider that aesthetically unpleasant. i want people to
need to say nothing other than:
include handy.mak
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry:
Have classroom, will lecture.
http://crashcourse.ca Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
========================================================================
- setting a make "include" path right from the get-go, Robert P. J. Day, 2008/12/07
- Re: setting a make "include" path right from the get-go, Robert P. J. Day, 2008/12/07
- Re: setting a make "include" path right from the get-go, Garrett Cooper, 2008/12/08
- Re: setting a make "include" path right from the get-go, Sam Ravnborg, 2008/12/09
- Re: setting a make "include" path right from the get-go,
Robert P. J. Day <=
- Re: setting a make "include" path right from the get-go, Paul Smith, 2008/12/09
- Re: setting a make "include" path right from the get-go, Robert P. J. Day, 2008/12/09
- Re: setting a make "include" path right from the get-go, Paul Smith, 2008/12/09
- Re: setting a make "include" path right from the get-go, Robert P. J. Day, 2008/12/09