[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: why isn't command expansion deferred?? (stupid question probably)
From: |
Paul Smith |
Subject: |
RE: why isn't command expansion deferred?? (stupid question probably) |
Date: |
Sun, 31 Jan 2010 20:12:32 -0500 |
On Sun, 2010-01-31 at 17:04 -0800, Mark Galeck (CW) wrote:
> I see, thank you for explaining! How does your server know I reply to
> an "unrelated thread", when I change the subject line??
Only the weakest email clients do threading via the subject line: it's
far too arbitrary and error-prone :-).
If your mail client has an option to view all headers, or view the
message source unfiltered (I know things like Microsoft Outlook cannot
do this) you should take a look sometime. There are LOTS of very
interesting headers in a typical email message.
One of them is a Message-ID: header which contains a globally unique
string which identifies this email from all others.
Another is a References: header, which contains a list of Message-ID
values that your message is replying to. Whenever you reply, the new
message you created contains in a References: header which is a copy of
the References header from the message you're replying to, plus the
message-ID of the message you're replying to, so it grows as threads are
created.
This is how all right-thinking email clients construct threads.
Cheers!
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paul D. Smith <address@hidden> Find some GNU make tips at:
http://www.gnu.org http://make.mad-scientist.net
"Please remain calm...I may be mad, but I am a professional." --Mad Scientist