RE: Interpreting Results of Make Check

[Feuerbacher, Alan]

Ed Meyer wrote:

> I put 26729 there to make the tests more robust by replacing hard-coded 
> tolerances
with tolerances that account for the size of the test numbers;  you should see 
no difference
except possibly with test('fftfilt')

Unfortunately neither one of them completed properly. Here are the results of 
trying your (renamed) patch and the latest of the others:

####################
afbacher:~/GCC/Octave/exp37/octave-3.6.3$ patch -Np1 -i 
../../octave-fftfilt-my.patch 
patching file scripts/signal/fftfilt.m
patch: **** malformed patch at line 122:  %!error fftfilt (1)

afbacher:~/GCC/Octave/exp37/octave-3.6.3$ patch -Np1 -i 
../../octave-fftfilt-2012sep11.patch
patching file scripts/signal/fftfilt.m
Hunk #2 FAILED at 139.
1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file scripts/signal/fftfilt.m.rej
####################

Any idea what I should do next?

Alan