[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Interpreting Results of Make Check
From: |
Feuerbacher, Alan |
Subject: |
RE: Interpreting Results of Make Check |
Date: |
Fri, 12 Oct 2012 14:32:05 +0000 |
Jordi GutiƩrrez Hermoso wrote:
> > 1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
> > scripts/signal/fftfilt.m.rej ####################
> >
> > Any idea what I should do next?
>
> You could read the patch, the source, and figure out where to apply the
> patch to the source. The patch is against the development source, but
> there hasn't been too dramatic a change from the released source.
> It shouldn't be so difficult to figure out how to adapt the patch.
Ok, I became "patch" and did that.
I reran make check and now I get TWO FAILS on the fftfilt.m test rather than
one. The first time the results showed 8/9 tests passing; this time the results
show 8/10, so apparently one more test was run.
Alan
- Interpreting Results of Make Check, Feuerbacher, Alan, 2012/10/10
- Re: Interpreting Results of Make Check, Ed Meyer, 2012/10/10
- RE: Interpreting Results of Make Check, Feuerbacher, Alan, 2012/10/10
- Re: Interpreting Results of Make Check, Ed Meyer, 2012/10/10
- RE: Interpreting Results of Make Check, Feuerbacher, Alan, 2012/10/11
- Re: Interpreting Results of Make Check, Ed Meyer, 2012/10/11
- RE: Interpreting Results of Make Check, Feuerbacher, Alan, 2012/10/11
- Re: Interpreting Results of Make Check, Jordi GutiƩrrez Hermoso, 2012/10/11
- RE: Interpreting Results of Make Check,
Feuerbacher, Alan <=
- Re: Interpreting Results of Make Check, Ed Meyer, 2012/10/12
- RE: Interpreting Results of Make Check, Feuerbacher, Alan, 2012/10/12
- Re: Interpreting Results of Make Check, Ed Meyer, 2012/10/12
- RE: Interpreting Results of Make Check, Feuerbacher, Alan, 2012/10/12
- Re: Interpreting Results of Make Check, Ed Meyer, 2012/10/12
- Re: Interpreting Results of Make Check, Daniel Sebald, 2012/10/17