|
From: | lukshuntim |
Subject: | Re: Octave m-file encryption |
Date: | Wed, 29 Oct 2014 15:04:08 +0800 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 |
On Wednesday, October 29, 2014 10:50 AM, maber wrote:
I supposed I should not have mentioned the word encryption in such kind of forum Jordi, I disagree with you. First. The m-file is not unique to octave. its a Matlab file right and generated in Matlab!... as long as one plays under the the rules of GNU. Secondly what interest would the opensource community have in a m-file filled with instrument-specific numbers and confidential patient data? only reverse engineers would have interest in that. Im new to Octave and from outside view, it appears that if Octave had a little more flexibility it would become larger player on the scene! MN
Hi,It seems to be a gap of communication. You've clarified what you want - not obfuscating the code but encrypting your (sensitive) data.
I don't recall seeing any crypto module/package in octave. Maybe no such need has arisen before. From a design point of view, it's not a good idea to put code and data together (in an m-file), and doing crypto correctly is hard.
Regards, ST --
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |