|
From: | Markus Bergholz |
Subject: | Re: Octave m-file encryption |
Date: | Wed, 29 Oct 2014 08:15:34 +0100 |
On Wednesday, October 29, 2014 10:50 AM, maber wrote:
I supposed I should not have mentioned the word encryption in such kind of
forum
Jordi, I disagree with you. First. The m-file is not unique to octave. its a
Matlab file right and generated in Matlab!... as long as one plays under the
the rules of GNU.
Secondly what interest would the opensource community have in a m-file
filled with instrument-specific numbers and confidential patient data? only
reverse engineers would have interest in that. Im new to Octave and from
outside view, it appears that if Octave had a little more flexibility it
would become larger player on the scene!
MN
Hi,
It seems to be a gap of communication. You've clarified what you want - not obfuscating the code but encrypting your (sensitive) data.
I don't recall seeing any crypto module/package in octave.
Maybe no such need has arisen before. From a design point of view, it's not a good idea to put code and data together (in an m-file), and doing crypto correctly is hard.
Regards,
ST
--
_______________________________________________
Help-octave mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-octave
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |