[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: xlsread return error: No Java support found (no Java JRE? no Java pk
From: |
Markus Mützel |
Subject: |
Re: xlsread return error: No Java support found (no Java JRE? no Java pkg installed AND loaded?) |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Jul 2019 18:53:45 +0200 |
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 03:06:04 -0500 (CDT)
> From: cmt <address@hidden>
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: xlsread return error: No Java support found (no Java JRE?
> no Java pkg installed AND loaded?)
> Message-ID: <address@hidden>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> Hi mmuetzel,
>
> thanks for your quick help. I tried your Code and it worked partially. The
> data is read and stored in data_autokorr_num, data_autokorr_str,
> data_autokorr_raw. The remaining Problem ist the Format. The original data
> Looks like:
> 0.000 12.000 15.000
> 0.006 12.000 15.000
> 0.012 12.000 15.000
>
>
> but for data_autokorr_num I receive:
> NaN 12000 15000
> NaN 12000 15000
> NaN 12000 15000
>
> and for data_autokorr_raw:
> 0.000 12000 15000
> 0.006 12000 15000
> 0.012 12000 15000
>
> and for data_autokorr_str:
> 0.000 12000 15000
> 0.006 12000 15000
> 0.012 12000 15000
>
> Is it a Problem, that the german Version of Excel denote the "." as a
> sperator for 10^3? But why does it work for the first column?
>
Since I don't know your Excel file, I don't know what output you should expect.
So the following is just speculation:
It looks like the first column is formatted as text in Excel. The second and
third columns are numeric.
How the numbers are formatted (thousands separator, currency, ...) in Excel
doesn't really matter. Octave only reads the numbers.
Is it possible that the data in your original Excel file was imported from a
text file? In this case, make sure to set up the correct decimal separators
during import (in Excel). If you don't, the "text" in the first column might
suddenly change to numbers above 1000 once the value passes "1.000"...
Are you sure data_autokorr_raw and data_autokorr_str contain exactly the same
values?
Markus