[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Help-smalltalk] [poll] regex literals
From: |
Tony Garnock-Jones |
Subject: |
Re: [Help-smalltalk] [poll] regex literals |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Feb 2008 11:20:30 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.14 (X11/20071210) |
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> It's also slower, which is why as of today 'a.*b' works even without
> sending #asRegex.
Slower because of repeated sends of asRegex?
I'd rather see new syntax for compile-time evaluation in literal
position, instead of specialised syntax for regex literals.
##('a.*b' asRegex)
> However, *always* treating string literals as regexes is going to give
> problems in the long term.
Agreed. Type-punning is often not a great idea.
Regards,
Tony