Re: [Help-smalltalk] Correct way to throw exceptions/errors from C to ST

[Holger Hans Peter Freyther]

On Sun, Apr 05, 2015 at 05:44:52PM +0200, Roland Plüss wrote:

> That sounds bad. I don't want to spawn a new process whenever I send a
> message to the smalltalk scripts for performance reasons (unless running
> a smalltalk process is so lightweight you don't notice it). Do I have to
> use a different call? I didn't find anything better than this.

Smalltalk processes are cheap. You need an execution environment
for thisContext and others and the easiest is to create a temporary
call-in process.