Re: [zile-devel] 2.2.1: excessive compiler warning flags

[Reuben Thomas]

On Fri, 15 Jul 2005, Christian Weisgerber wrote:

> Most of these are caused by int constants being passed as arguments
> for size_t parameters (size_t expands to unsigned long on LP64
> architectures, i.e., uint64_t), which is totally harmless.  Asking
> gcc to complain about this with this string of -W options is excessive
> and only obscures real problems.

Actually, this should be fixed: int is not compatible with size_t as it 
could be negative. I'm puzzled that gcc doesn't complain on 32-bit 
arches too (normally it gives a signed-vs-unsigned warning in similar 
cases).

I'll fix all these.

Thanks for the other fix too.

--
http://rrt.sc3d.org/ | God is the name of our ignorance (Grayling)