Re: Usage with Eglot?

[Robert Weiner]

Hi Marc:

There presently is no Hyperbole support for either language.  Maybe if we 
generalize the language-specific handling, we’ll add some.

-- rsw

> On Apr 10, 2024, at 9:15 AM, Marc Coquand <marc@mccd.space> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi!
> 
> Thanks for the rapid response.
> 
> So the languages where it did not work are Typescript
> and OCaml, both running in eglot mode.
> 
> Sincerely,
> Marc
> 
> Robert Weiner <rsw@gnu.org> writes:
> 
>> Hi Marc:
>> 
>> In general, Hyperbole will use the current xref backend for definition 
>> lookup, but this is language-specific as other
>> methods have been preferred in the past.  For example, in Python, the jedi 
>> language server traditionally was
>> preferred over xref (often TAGS files).  We are redoing the Python support 
>> now to allow for Eglot or other xref
>> backends.  What language(s) are you using where Hyperbole did not invoke 
>> your xref backend?
>> 
>> -- rsw
>> 
>> On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 4:43 PM Marc Coquand <marc@mccd.space> wrote:
>> 
>> Heya,
>> 
>> With embark, currently embark-dwim figures out that if I select a
>> function with eglot mode running, I want to go to definition.
>> 
>> Is there something similar available for hyperbole that can be setup?
>> I'd love it if the M-Ret would open the reference of the function at point
>> (xref-find-definitions) or otherwise attempt
>> eldoc-documentation-at-point.
>> 
>> Thanks in advance for all help.
>> Marc
>