Re: Usage with Eglot?

[Marc Coquand]

I see, if there was generic support for eglot-mode, it would work for
both languages and probably many more.

Robert Weiner <rswgnu@gmail.com> writes:

> Hi Marc:
>
> There presently is no Hyperbole support for either language.  Maybe if
> we generalize the language-specific handling, we’ll add some.
>
> -- rsw
>
>> On Apr 10, 2024, at 9:15 AM, Marc Coquand <marc@mccd.space> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Hi!
>> 
>> Thanks for the rapid response.
>> 
>> So the languages where it did not work are Typescript
>> and OCaml, both running in eglot mode.
>> 
>> Sincerely,
>> Marc
>> 
>> Robert Weiner <rsw@gnu.org> writes:
>> 
>>> Hi Marc:
>>> 
>>> In general, Hyperbole will use the current xref backend for
>>> definition lookup, but this is language-specific as other
>>> methods have been preferred in the past.  For example, in Python, the jedi 
>>> language server traditionally was
>>> preferred over xref (often TAGS files).  We are redoing the Python support 
>>> now to allow for Eglot or other xref
>>> backends.  What language(s) are you using where Hyperbole did not invoke 
>>> your xref backend?
>>> 
>>> -- rsw
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 4:43 PM Marc Coquand <marc@mccd.space> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Heya,
>>> 
>>> With embark, currently embark-dwim figures out that if I select a
>>> function with eglot mode running, I want to go to definition.
>>> 
>>> Is there something similar available for hyperbole that can be setup?
>>> I'd love it if the M-Ret would open the reference of the function at point
>>> (xref-find-definitions) or otherwise attempt
>>> eldoc-documentation-at-point.
>>> 
>>> Thanks in advance for all help.
>>> Marc
>>