[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: pgg, gnupg, and PGP?
From: |
Bill Harris |
Subject: |
Re: pgg, gnupg, and PGP? |
Date: |
Mon, 15 Nov 2004 20:20:55 GMT |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (windows-nt) |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
asjo@koldfront.dk (Adam Sjøgren) writes:
> Perhaps by modifying ~/.gnupg/options? I've got this in mine:
>
> # The next option is enabled because this one is needed for interoperation
> # with PGP 5 users. To enable full OpenPGP compliance you have to remove
> # this option.
>
> force-v3-sigs
Windows Privacy Tray didn't seem to give me a gnupg.conf.skel or
whatever, so I created a gnupg.conf with your suggested content, and
I'll test it to see if both my PGP and GnuPG colleagues can verify
signatures.
> I haven't noticed any drawbacks by not having "full OpenPGP
> compliance", but I haven't looked into the issue either, so YMMV.
I did a quick search but turned up nothing of interest.
Thanks,
Bill
- --
Bill Harris
Facilitated Systems
http://facilitatedsystems.com/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)
Comment: For more information, see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQFBmQ+k3J3HaQTDvd8RAhZ0AJ9cPZOGIfZURN44HV3ZM+JhWvC1MACdE7Mk
l/22Jto4Es/u+V3WQB0EHpI=
=V+1v
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- pgg, gnupg, and PGP?, Bill Harris, 2004/11/11
- Re: pgg, gnupg, and PGP?, Adam Sjøgren, 2004/11/12
- Re: pgg, gnupg, and PGP?,
Bill Harris <=
- Re: pgg, gnupg, and PGP?, Simon Josefsson, 2004/11/14