[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Development Meeting 20211022
From: |
Giorgio Maone |
Subject: |
Re: Development Meeting 20211022 |
Date: |
Fri, 29 Oct 2021 01:44:42 +0200 |
User-agent: |
None of Your Business 1.0 |
Hi Libor,
I'm working here:
https://pagure.io/JS-Shield/JS-Shield/tree/211027fixes
There's 1 startup reliability improvement and 1 spoofability fix (see
the difference at https://noscript.net/test/jShelter/ )
Let's talk about frames and UI in general at the design meeting.
Best,
-- G
On 27/10/21 23:33, Giorgio Maone wrote:
> On 25/10/21 13:11, Libor Polčák wrote:
>> ATM you can continue to commit to a special branch in the JS-Shield
>> pagure repository, send me a notification and I will merge that to
>> master or ask some questions. Does this work for you?
>>
> That's all right, thanks.
>> I. I think I can see issues like a user turns the extension off but
>> one of the iframes loads a page with a different level.
> I'll look into it.
>
>> Another issue is TLD window on level A, iframe on level B that
>> contains another iframe. Should the level of the inner-most iframe be
>> A or B?
> It should be level A (inheriting from top document) IMHO, because the
> rationale for cascading is that (in current versions) you cannot "see"
> frames and their domains in the contextual UI, hence you could not
> modify the level of a "broken" iframe which is set to DEFAULT (or even
> know you need to). All you can do to "fix" things is changing the top
> level and propagating to any DEFAULT frame, hoping for the best.
>
--
Giorgio Maone
https://maone.net