koha-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Koha-devel] Some thoughts about the "Dewey" field


From: Saiful Amin
Subject: Re: [Koha-devel] Some thoughts about the "Dewey" field
Date: Thu Nov 28 14:05:03 2002

<quote who="Ambrose Li [CCCGT]">
> Hmm, I thought that both Dewey and LC have similar functions.
> But then I'm not a librarian.

Yes, you are right here.

> My understanding is that the primary function of both Dewey and
> LC is to determine the physical locations of a book; they just
> happen to also indicate a "primary" topic (whatever that means).
>
> The "real" classification (assignment of subject headings) use
> a list such as Sears (usually used together with Dewey) or the
> LC subject headings (usually used together with the LC code).
> Multiple subject headings can be assigned, and in the case of
> MARC these are placed in the 6XX and 7XX fields. In the case
> of having multiple topics in a book (which is usually the case),
> the librarian doing the cataloguing would decide which is the
> "primary" topic and use that as a basis to assign the call
> number.

Strictly in librarians terminology, the job of a classifier is to assign
the class number to a document using any classification scheme such as
DDC, LC, and UDC.  The assignment of subject headings (or 'keywords' for
IT people) is the job of the cataloguer.  Since the cataloguing of a book
is done after the book has been classified the subject headings/keywords
can be derived from the class number using any method such as "Chain
Procedure."  The chain procedure of Ranganathan was successfully used in
the British National Bibliography (until mid-seventies) to create the
subject index.

So, I really don't know what you mean by "real" classification :-(

Saiful






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]