|
From: | Dave Thorne |
Subject: | Re: [Koha-devel] Intranet Security |
Date: | Fri Apr 18 19:15:06 2003 |
I must say that although the library I am speaking on behalf of would not need more than one layer of security abstraction, for larger systems I believe it would be necessary. In order to make Koha as 'marketable' as possible (in the least capitalistic way) such a permissions based user environment would be greatly preferred, giving more configurability (and therefore leaving Koha available to a wider potential user base) which can only be a good thing. As long as the extra work required to manage such permissions is kept to an absolute minimum so as not to impinge on the experience of smaller libraries we should be on to a winner. How about permission groups? Then you could set up 'desk clerk' and 'librarian' as two seperate groups (or user types) with the associated permissions set to the groups, and simply add users to or remove them from these groups. The act of setting every possible permission for a new user is then made a thousand fold easier.
Although I admit I have not yet looked at the user administration section in detail, I can't imagine it would take much to implement. Any comments?
Dave
----Original message from jferraro follows----
Joshua
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |