Re: [Koha-devel] IMPORTANT Koha 3.0 updatedatase and kohastructure.sql

[Chris Cormack]

On 4/07/2007, at 12:54 PM, MJ Ray wrote:

> "Joshua M. Ferraro" <address@hidden> wrote: [...]
> > I'd also like to point out that updatedatabase should start  
> > completely
> > blank for 3.0. IMO updatedatabase shouldn't be the upgrade path
> > from 1.x or 2.x to 3.0 ... rather, it should be the upgrade path
> > for 3.0 to 3.2, etc. Other thoughts?
>
> I thought updatedatabase started as the upgrade path from 2.0 to 2.2
> or similar.  How will 2.2 users upgrade to 3.0 if not updatedatabase?

Hmm yeah, good question.

> > I'd like to get feedback from everyone on the best way to maintain
> > kohastructure.sql and updatedatabase, to make sure we always have a
> > known SQL definition and update process. Comments, ideas?
>
> Firstly, the dumps should be made with the same options.  How about:
>   LANG=C mysqldump -cnQ koha >kohastructure.sql
> ?
I like it

> My second suggestion is more radical: kohastructure.sql should only be
> changed in a branch by the release manager.  Ideally, that would only
> happen with each release at most.  At all other times, ALTER
> statements and other transformations should be added to an upgrade
> file, say called kohastructure-3.0.0.sql, then kohastructure-3.0.1.sql
> - or should it be .pl and done with DBI commands?
>
> If included in the release, they could also be the basis of the
> database upgrade, just running that one change file for each release.
That sounds like a great idea, much easier to track changes, and it  
does allow an easy upgrade path.

Chris

--
Chris Cormack                            address@hidden
VP Research and Development                        www.liblime.com
LibLime                                             +64 21 542 131