[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lp-ca-on] LibreJS in Parliament
From: |
Greg Wright |
Subject: |
Re: [lp-ca-on] LibreJS in Parliament |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Apr 2016 20:32:33 -0400 |
User-agent: |
K-9 Mail for Android |
Just realized the PP wasn't for a second the message I sent to CC
On April 13, 2016 8:48:02 PM AST, Matt Lee <address@hidden> wrote:
>Fwiw, if you wrote to virtually any website with the email you posted
>in
>the piratepad, you'll be ignored.
>
>You need to explain the issue: the vast majority of free software users
>don't even agree with the nonfree JavaScript issue yet and the tools
>which
>detect and process the labels and license markup aren't there yet.
>
>I think the JavaScript trap is still a legitimate concern but I think
>the
>approach taken with LibreJS isn't working.
- [lp-ca-on] LibreJS in Parliament, Greg Wright, 2016/04/13
- Re: [lp-ca-on] LibreJS in Parliament, Sergio Durigan Junior, 2016/04/13
- Re: [lp-ca-on] LibreJS in Parliament, Greg Wright, 2016/04/13
- Re: [lp-ca-on] LibreJS in Parliament, Matt Lee, 2016/04/13
- Re: [lp-ca-on] LibreJS in Parliament, Greg Wright, 2016/04/13
- Message not available
- Re: [lp-ca-on] LibreJS in Parliament, Matt Lee, 2016/04/13
- Re: [lp-ca-on] LibreJS in Parliament, Greg Wright, 2016/04/13
- Message not available
- Re: [lp-ca-on] LibreJS in Parliament, Matt Lee, 2016/04/13
- Re: [lp-ca-on] LibreJS in Parliament, Greg Wright, 2016/04/13
- Re: [lp-ca-on] LibreJS in Parliament,
Greg Wright <=