[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Ubuntu malware: what to do?
From: |
Michael Dorrington |
Subject: |
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Ubuntu malware: what to do? |
Date: |
Sun, 09 Dec 2012 13:50:37 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20121027 Icedove/3.0.11 |
On 08/12/12 17:56, Jason Self wrote:
> them to switch. Trisquel, for example, also meets the criteria you say
> and comes with both freedom and privacy included.
Trisquel contains non-free documentation:
http://packages.trisquel.info/brigantia/gcc-4.6-doc
This package contains unmodifiable (non-licence) parts. You might be
better of with Debian 'main' which does come with freedom included.
Cheers,
Mike.
--
FSF member #9429
http://www.fsf.org/register_form?referrer=9429
http://www.fsf.org/about
"The Free Software Foundation (FSF) is a nonprofit with a worldwide
mission to promote computer user freedom and to defend the rights of all
free software users."
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Ubuntu malware: what to do?, (continued)
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Ubuntu malware: what to do?, Aviv de Morgan, 2012/12/08
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Ubuntu malware: what to do?, Jason Self, 2012/12/08
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Ubuntu malware: what to do?, Alexander Berntsen, 2012/12/08
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Ubuntu malware: what to do?, Jay Cassano, 2012/12/08
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Ubuntu malware: what to do?, Yogesh Girikumar, 2012/12/08
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Ubuntu malware: what to do?, John Sullivan, 2012/12/08
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Ubuntu malware: what to do?, Jason Self, 2012/12/08
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Ubuntu malware: what to do?,
Michael Dorrington <=
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Ubuntu malware: what to do?, Jason Self, 2012/12/09
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Ubuntu malware: what to do?, Ted Smith, 2012/12/08
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Ubuntu malware: what to do?, John Sullivan, 2012/12/08