Re: [libreplanet-discuss] My Analysis of Multimedia Codecs supported by various portable MP3 & Vorbis players, including smart-phones

[Bianca Gibson]

Because it was in a presentation in January I'm not sure what codecs it was compared to - memory doesn't have that detail back that far.
I know they were at the same bit rate though.

On 17 December 2012 19:07, Alexey Eromenko <al4321@gmail.com> wrote:

>Maybe mention the storage advantages of ogg compared to mp3?

Yes, I will.

On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Bianca Gibson
<bianca.rachel.gibson@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Also, I went to a talk about opus early this year. Sounds *much* better than
> other codecs at low bit rates.

I don't know - I have tested Opus vs Vorbis vs Wave (lossless CD
quaility) at 48 kbps on $1000 speakers, and they sound about the same
for my ears. I.e. transparent; I was not able to distinguish between
them and original.
Only at 32 kbps I can hear artifacts in Opus. But Vorbis does not
support 32 kbps, only 48 kbps and up.

--
-Alexey Eromenko "Technologov"