[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Reverse Engineering
From: |
Mike Gerwitz |
Subject: |
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Reverse Engineering |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Feb 2016 07:56:11 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 09:42:34 +0100, Fabio Pesari wrote:
> On 02/10/2016 01:06 AM, arthur_torrey@comcast.net wrote:
>> This seems like something that MIGHT be helped, or at least encouraged, by
>> the folks in the "Digital Right to Repair" movement. They are trying to
>> produce a legal REQUIREMENT that companies release the information needed
>> for outside entities to service their products to the same extent that an
>> in-house entity would. I don't know that this would drill down far enough
>> to require releasing signing keys, but one might be able to make a case
>> for it.... If nothing else it would make it harder to block efforts to
>> crack the signature...
>
> Do you mean http://repair.org/ ? I agree. I think the FSF should
> approach them.
This is interesting; thank (you both) for sharing.
--
Mike Gerwitz
Free Software Hacker | GNU Maintainer
https://mikegerwitz.com
FSF Member #5804 | GPG Key ID: 0x8EE30EAB
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Reverse Engineering, Tobias Platen, 2016/02/06
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Reverse Engineering, arthur_torrey, 2016/02/09
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Reverse Engineering, arthur_torrey, 2016/02/09
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Reverse Engineering, arthur_torrey, 2016/02/10