[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Uniform look-and-feel on GNU/Linux
From: |
Fabio Pesari |
Subject: |
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Uniform look-and-feel on GNU/Linux |
Date: |
Sat, 9 Apr 2016 11:49:32 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/38.7.0 |
On 04/08/2016 11:38 PM, Will Hill wrote:
> Multiple tool kits with long term continuity that work well together are a
> free software strength. I regularly use best of class applications from KDE,
> Gnome, Trinity, Window Maker, and others on E16. I'm able to share
> information between these programs, on multiple computers, in ways that are
> impossible on non free platforms. UI and toolset whiplash is something I
> hate and is regularly forced on non free software users. Those other
> platforms are hardly more consistent and are almost always less functional.
> Free software has given me both beautiful new things and UI continuity with a
> time scale of decades. Here, have a look,
>
> http://50.80.140.55/photo_album/chron/desktop/trinity16.html
> http://50.80.140.55/photo_album/chron/desktop/thinkpad/thinkpads.html
>
> Please do not call the software I love "ugly" or say that I do not care. I'm
> going to some effort to keep things stable for myself. Your goals are better
> than those negative terms. Talk about things you consider beautiful and tell
> people specific things you consider helpful to people with disabilities.
Sorry Will, I did not want to offend anybody or make generalizations - I
didn't mean that all GNU/Linux users don't care about their GUIs, but
more along the lines that they are more tolerant of visual inconsistencies.
I can only speak from my own experience as a user of many music
production programs, and the average UI is not only what I would
consider "ugly" but also offers zero accessibility:
http://rakarrack.sourceforge.net/rakarrack.jpg
http://guitarix.org/images/screenshots/gx_tuner-4.12.jpg
https://a.fsdn.com/con/app/proj/yoshimi/screenshots/Collage.png
Many music programs have quite pleasing UIs but they still not conform
to any existing standards and draw their own widgets:
http://milkytracker.org/screenshots/desktop/raina-Default.png
http://bristol.sourceforge.net/mini.gif
I don't think we should sweep this issue under the rug - I frankly think
that it is an obstacle to the adoption these programs.
And beauty was never something I cared about in programs: I regularly
use a pretty minimalist i3 setup which most people would consider
"ugly". What I care about is consistency, predictability, usability and
accessibility, so when I say "ugly" I don't mean it as the opposite of
"beautiful", but as a violation of those four parameters.