|
From: | Pen-Yuan Hsing |
Subject: | Re: [libreplanet-discuss] suggestion/help. GPL enforcement. |
Date: | Mon, 6 Jun 2016 23:08:31 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1 |
On 2016-06-06 20:42, John Sullivan wrote:
al3xu5 / dotcommon <dotcommon@autistici.org> writes:If copyright laws didn't exist, then we would not need GPL! GPL exists just to "circumvent" copyright... RegardsUnfortunately that's not the case. It's true that the GPL uses the power of copyright against copyright, but it also uses copyright to protect users against non-copyright aggression, including EULAs and patents. If copyright went away first, we would have no GPL (in its current incarnation), and proprietary restrictions on software and its distribution could still be enforced using EULAs (contracts). -john
So to confirm: Proprietary software's EULAs are completely *independent* of copyright? If so are EULAs just enforced as any other contract without the power of copyright? If so, would it make any difference if software patents also didn't exist? Sorry I just want to understand this completely!
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |