Re: [libreplanet-discuss] [Dev] [consensus][due: 2016-06-13]: New version for Parabola Social Contract

[André Silva]

On 06/15/2016 03:15 AM, André Silva wrote:
> On 06/15/2016 02:57 AM, coadde wrote:
>> Now, see my new proposal below with the new changes about invariant
>> sections, what do you think?
> 
> +1, however i think we could add another detail in the exception part in
> clause 2 to mean "cover texts" as another exception, eg:
> 
> 2.  **Parabola is Free Culture**: All documentation and cultural works
>     included in products of the Parabola project are [Free
> Culture](http://freedomdefined.org/Definition),
>     with the exceptions of: [licenses for works stating a
> viewpoint](http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#OpinionLicenses),
>     [invariant
> sections](https://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl-howto-opt#SEC1) and
>     [cover texts](https://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl-howto-opt#SEC2).
>     All documentation and cultural works created by or for Parabola are
>     Free Culture, with no exceptions.

I forgot add my suggestion about adhocracy with some changes for clause 4 :P

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

4.  **Parabola and its community**: Parabola's community is [democratic
    in its essence](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consensus_democracy)
and [adhocratic](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adhocracy) as form of
organization,
    so the community is to be included whenever there is a need to make
    a decision.
    We encourage community participation in the development of the
    project.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Adding "adhocracy" as form of organization clarify how works the
development of the project to encourage community participation. ;)

What do you think guys?

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature