libreplanet-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] [Dev] [consensus][due: 2016-06-13]: New versio


From: Crazytoon
Subject: Re: [libreplanet-discuss] [Dev] [consensus][due: 2016-06-13]: New version for Parabola Social Contract
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 05:08:58 -0300

El 15/06/16 a las 04:26, coadde escribió:
> On 06/15/2016 04:23 AM, André Silva wrote:
>> On 06/15/2016 03:15 AM, André Silva wrote:
>>> On 06/15/2016 02:57 AM, coadde wrote:
>>>> Now, see my new proposal below with the new changes about invariant
>>>> sections, what do you think?
>>>
>>> +1, however i think we could add another detail in the exception part in
>>> clause 2 to mean "cover texts" as another exception, eg:
>>>
>>> 2.  **Parabola is Free Culture**: All documentation and cultural works
>>>     included in products of the Parabola project are [Free
>>> Culture](http://freedomdefined.org/Definition),
>>>     with the exceptions of: [licenses for works stating a
>>> viewpoint](http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#OpinionLicenses),
>>>     [invariant
>>> sections](https://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl-howto-opt#SEC1) and
>>>     [cover texts](https://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl-howto-opt#SEC2).
>>>     All documentation and cultural works created by or for Parabola are
>>>     Free Culture, with no exceptions.
>>
>> I forgot add my suggestion about adhocracy with some changes for clause 4 :P
>>
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> 4.  **Parabola and its community**: Parabola's community is [democratic
>>     in its essence](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consensus_democracy)
>> and [adhocratic](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adhocracy) as form of
>> organization,
>>     so the community is to be included whenever there is a need to make
>>     a decision.
>>     We encourage community participation in the development of the
>>     project.
>>
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Adding "adhocracy" as form of organization clarify how works the
>> development of the project to encourage community participation. ;)
>>
>> What do you think guys?
> 
> +1

+1

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]