[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] [Dev] Misleading information in EOMA68 news
From: |
Tiberiu-Cezar Tehnoetic |
Subject: |
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] [Dev] Misleading information in EOMA68 news |
Date: |
Fri, 26 Aug 2016 01:26:12 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/38.8.0 |
On 25.08.2016 15:47, Tiberiu-Cezar Tehnoetic wrote:
> On 25.08.2016 15:25, Adonay Felipe Nogueira wrote:
>> This issue of "you said it is 'libre' but I prove it's not", and even
>> the issue regarding the older publication on ThinkPenguin's site, can be
>> easily solved by changing terms/words accordingly there. There's no need
>> to make everyone mad at each other.
>
> It's not just about terminology. It's about deliberately misinforming
> the people to back your project because it's been libre hardware and
> libre software "right from the beginning". And also misinforming people
> to think it's OK for their freedom to buy laptops with proprietary BIOS
> rather than with Libreboot.
Richard Stallman has just confirmed me that FSF has not received the PCB
design sources along with the Libre Tea Computer Card.
I hope that now everyone understands that this EOMA68 board is *not*
libre hardware as claimed.
Tiberiu
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] [Dev] Misleading information in EOMA68 news, (continued)
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] [Dev] Misleading information in EOMA68 news, Eric Schultz, 2016/08/26
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] [Dev] Misleading information in EOMA68 news, Tiberiu-Cezar Tehnoetic, 2016/08/26
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] [Dev] Misleading information in EOMA68 news, Ali Razeen, 2016/08/26
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] [Dev] Misleading information in EOMA68 news, Tiberiu-Cezar Tehnoetic, 2016/08/26
- Message not available
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] [Dev] Misleading information in EOMA68 news, Tiberiu-Cezar Tehnoetic, 2016/08/26
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] [Dev] Misleading information in EOMA68 news, Adonay Felipe Nogueira, 2016/08/26
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] [Dev] Misleading information in EOMA68 news, Adonay Felipe Nogueira, 2016/08/25
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] [Dev] Misleading information in EOMA68 news, Tiberiu-Cezar Tehnoetic, 2016/08/25
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] [Dev] Misleading information in EOMA68 news,
Tiberiu-Cezar Tehnoetic <=
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] [Dev] Misleading information in EOMA68 news, Paul Kocialkowski, 2016/08/25
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] [Dev] Misleading information in EOMA68 news, Tiberiu-Cezar Tehnoetic, 2016/08/25
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] [Dev] Misleading information in EOMA68 news, Christopher Waid, 2016/08/25
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] [Dev] Misleading information in EOMA68 news, Tiberiu-Cezar Tehnoetic, 2016/08/25
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] [Dev] Misleading information in EOMA68 news, Adam Van Ymeren, 2016/08/25
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] [Dev] Misleading information in EOMA68 news, Christopher Waid, 2016/08/25
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] [Dev] Misleading information in EOMA68 news, Adam Van Ymeren, 2016/08/25
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] [Dev] Misleading information in EOMA68 news, Christopher Waid, 2016/08/25
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] [Dev] Misleading information in EOMA68 news, Christopher Waid, 2016/08/25
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] [Dev] Misleading information in EOMA68 news, Christopher Waid, 2016/08/25